Skip to content

SAICA Events

Home

Home

Evaluation – 2021 SAICAs Practice Management Discussion – session 1 _ 23 June

You are here:

Home
Evaluation – 2021 SAICAs Practice…

SAICAs Practice Management Discussion – Session 1

Date: 23 June 2021

Please rate the following on a scale of 1-5 (5 being excellent)

5 Stars: Excellent
4 Stars: Good
3 Stars: Satisfactory
2 Stars: Un-Satisfactory
1 Star: Poor

Pre-event Registration

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Registration on the day (Webcast Access):

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Comments

Please rate the discussion session:

Overall impression

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Scope and content

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Practical value

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Comments

Please rate the facilitator: Jeanne Viljoen

Jeanne: Presenting style

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Jeanne: Subject Knowledge

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Jeanne: Interaction with audience

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Comments

Please rate the speaker: Mark Lloydbottom

Mark: Presenting style

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Mark: Subject Knowledge

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Mark: Interaction with audience

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Comments

Please rate the commentator : Tzippy Subotzsky

Tzippy: Subject Knowledge

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Tzippy: Interaction with audience

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Comments

General Comments

Future topics and presenters

General comments and suggestions:

Please rate the following for the Technical Standards Division

Thought leadership contribution through publications, opinion or similar pieces and research projects

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Technical resources, for example guides, circulars, FAQs, newsletters, ASA magazine, recordings or similar offerings

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Ongoing communication of up-to-date and relevant information, knowledge and intellectual capital through available channels such emails, social media, website or similar

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Comments

Dream-Theme — truly premium WordPress themes

Go to Top