2020 SAICA TechTalk Series – GRAP, PFMA and MFMA Update (22 April)

You are here:

Please rate the following: *

	Poor	Un-satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	Excellent
Overall impression	Overall impression Poor	Overall impression Un-satisfactory	Overall impression Satisfactory	Overall impression Good	Overall impression Excellent
Scope and content	Scope and content Poor	Scope and content Un-satisfactory	Scope and content Satisfactory	Scope and content Good	Scope and content Excellent
Practical value	Practical value Poor	Practical value Un-satisfactory	Practical value Satisfactory	Practical value Good	Practical value Excellent

Please rate your presenter: Jeanine Poggiolini Technical Director at ASB *

	Poor	Un-satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	Excellent
Presentation style	Presentation style Poor	Presentation style Un-satisfactory	Presentation style Satisfactory	Presentation style Good	Presentation style Excellent
Subject knowledge	Subject knowledge Poor	Subject knowledge Un-satisfactory	Subject knowledge Satisfactory	Subject knowledge Good	Subject knowledge Excellent
Interaction with audience	Interaction with audience Poor	Interaction with audience Un-satisfactory	Interaction with audience Satisfactory	Interaction with audience Good	Interaction with audience Excellent

Please rate your presenter: Christopher Palm Chief Risk Advisor at IRMSA *

	Poor	Un-satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	Excellent
Presentation style	Presentation style Poor	Presentation style Un-satisfactory	Presentation style Satisfactory	Presentation style Good	Presentation style Excellent
Subject knowledge	Subject knowledge Poor	Subject knowledge Un-satisfactory	Subject knowledge Satisfactory	Subject knowledge Good	Subject knowledge Excellent
Interaction with audience	Interaction with audience Poor	Interaction with audience Un-satisfactory	Interaction with audience Satisfactory	Interaction with audience Good	Interaction with audience Excellent

Please rate your presenter: Natashia Soopal PD: Public Sector at SAICA *

	Poor	Un-satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	Excellent
Presentation style	Presentation style Poor	Presentation style Un-satisfactory	Presentation style Satisfactory	Presentation style Good	Presentation style Excellent
Subject knowledge	Subject knowledge Poor	Subject knowledge Un-satisfactory	Subject knowledge Satisfactory	Subject knowledge Good	Subject knowledge Excellent
Interaction with audience	Interaction with audience Poor	Interaction with audience Un-satisfactory	Interaction with audience Satisfactory	Interaction with audience Good	Interaction with audience Excellent

1. Does the TechTalk Series add value to your membership?

2. Does the TechTalk Series showcase Thought Leadership of the profession?

3. Are the topics discussed relevant and practical to members?

4. Which member constituency are you in?

6. Other ideas for improvements?